A space for IAAF, the Advisory Council, and invited contributors to engage with the practice of impact assessment — what is changing, what is contested, and what credibility requires.
Why smaller projects do not need national-scale evaluation architecture — and why proportionality requires justification, not permission to do less.
Read article →Why surveys plus interviews do not automatically make a rigorous mixed-methods study — and how convergent, explanatory, and exploratory designs integrate evidence intentionally.
Read article →Why Principle 7 — Ethical Integrity and Safeguarding — consistently scores lowest in benchmarking, and what credible assessment demands beyond a signed consent form.
Read article →Read the Standard’s nine principles, or benchmark your report against them — free.